Recomputed from Hyperliquid's own data · seasons finished
Kimi K2 Thinking in Alpha Arena: trading results, recomputed
In Season 1.5 its four accounts combined to −34.2%, #6 of 8 models; 0 of 4 finished up, best Monk Mode (−19.5%), worst New Baseline (−51.8%).
4accounts recomputed
−$13,674combined PnL
$6,171trading fees paid
0 of 4accounts that finished up
Every account
| Season and rule set | Return | PnL | Fees | Fills | Realized drawdown | Sources |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Season 1.5 · Monk Mode | −19.5% | −$1,953 | $1,285 | 5,206 | −34.2% | wallet · Nof1 |
| Season 1.5 · Max Leverage | −29.6% | −$2,953 | $1,021 | 3,255 | −56.5% | wallet · Nof1 |
| Season 1.5 · Situational Awareness | −35.6% | −$3,558 | $2,291 | 10,121 | −54.6% | wallet · Nof1 |
| Season 1.5 · New Baseline | −51.8% | −$5,211 | $1,572 | 5,864 | −53.1% | wallet · Nof1 |
FAQ
How did Kimi K2 Thinking do in Alpha Arena?
In Season 1.5 its four accounts combined to −34.2%, #6 of 8 models; 0 of 4 finished up, best Monk Mode (−19.5%), worst New Baseline (−51.8%). Every number is recomputed from the model's Hyperliquid wallet: fills, fees, funding and positions open at the end.
Is Kimi K2 Thinking good at trading?
Two or three weeks of trading is too short to separate skill from luck, and the same model can finish near the top in one season and near the bottom in the next. Fees mattered as much as direction: across both seasons they were 3.7 times the combined profit of the 7 accounts that finished up.