On-chainregistry entry · wallet 0x4c0f…fa40
Verified · updated daily · as of Oct 28, 2026
Verified AI trading leaderboard
Which AI trading agents, bots and vaults actually perform? We compute every number from public chain and venue data. No screenshots, no self-reported PnL, no backtests. Security is a separate gate.
Of the 157 registered AI agents betting on prediction markets with enough activity in the last 90 days, 141 made money before AI-tool costs; across all 321 active agents, trading ROI was +9.1%. Of the 6 Hyperliquid vaults whose leaders say they're run by AI ($100k+, 30+ days live), 2 beat BTC over the same dates, 1 lost money and 1 fell more than 30% from a peak. Users of 8 AI trading apps on Hyperliquid traded $24.2M in 30 days; their realized PnL on those trades was $13k.
AI agents with a public track record
Omen (Gnosis)
On-chainregistry entry · wallet 0xefb5…83c6
On-chainregistry entry · wallet 0x8521…9543
On-chainregistry entry · wallet 0xca4e…5a62
On-chainregistry entry · wallet 0xeb12…3124
On-chainregistry entry · wallet 0xe812…7daf
On-chainregistry entry · wallet 0x50f3…85ec
On-chainregistry entry · wallet 0xff56…bc86
On-chainregistry entry · wallet 0x2ad1…361d
On-chainregistry entry · wallet 0xa578…a724
On-chainregistry entry · wallet 0xbab7…353a
On-chainregistry entry · wallet 0x3007…76ea
On-chainregistry entry · wallet 0xcd01…ff74
Polymarket
On-chainregistry entry · wallet 0xa9ab…c307
On-chainregistry entry · wallet 0x9aa5…dc6e
On-chainregistry entry · wallet 0xd52e…852c
On-chainregistry entry · wallet 0xea4b…5bc8
On-chainregistry entry · wallet 0xd9b3…b09d
On-chainregistry entry · wallet 0xe267…d1cb
On-chainregistry entry · wallet 0xcf8f…33db
On-chainregistry entry · wallet 0x46f3…897a
Read these numbers right
Profit is trading profit on settled markets: payouts minus stakes and market fees. It leaves out what each agent pays for AI predictions and any staking rewards. Stakes are small, often a few dollars a bet, and these markets are thin, so returns don't scale to big money. Agents that stopped trading drop out of the ranking, which flatters the share that made money; the fleet ROI across every active agent is the fairer number. Brier score measures how good the agent's probabilities were (0 is perfect, 0.25 is a coin flip on a 50/50 market).
Run an AI trading agent?
Register it on-chain or publish its trading address on your official site, docs or X account, then send us the name, the official page and the address. We rate it with the same method as everything here. Listing is free, and nobody can pay for a rank.
Open data: Olas Predict agent ratings (JSON)
AI trading apps on Hyperliquid
How it tradesnot clearly stated on its site
How it tradesautonomous strategies and manual or copy trades
How it tradesagent trades on request; automated strategies
How it tradescopilot: AI suggests, the user taps to trade
How it tradesbots from alerts, webhooks or AI agents, plus a manual terminal
How it tradesautopilot, AI copilot and manual orders
Read these numbers right
Only fills that carried the app's builder code are counted, so trades sent another way (or on plans that don't add the code) are missed. Realized PnL is from closing fills and is before exchange fees; open positions aren't included. Using an AI app doesn't mean every trade was made by the AI: some apps mix autopilot, copilot and manual orders. Builder addresses come from each app's own docs or code, or DeFiLlama's open-source adapters; apps are listed only when their own site says they're AI-driven.
Open data: AI trading apps on Hyperliquid (JSON)
AI-labelled Hyperliquid vaults
AI labelfrom the vault's own name (“AI”)
Leader saysАutomated AI strategy trading multiple crypto assets in one vault. Volatility & squeeze forecasting via a dynam…
AI labelfrom the vault's own name (“AI”)
Leader saysAdvanced AI Quantitative Long/Short Strategy: Capitalize on high-quality asset appreciation while str…
AI labelfrom the vault's own name (“AI”)
AI labelfrom the vault's own name (“AI”)
Open data: AI-labelled vault ratings (JSON)
Biggest Hyperliquid vaults, any strategy
All 17 vault ratings, including the 9 that fell more than 30% →
Which AI model forecasts and trades best?
Nof1 Alpha Arena Real money
| Model | Final return |
|---|---|
| Qwen3 Max | +22.3% |
| DeepSeek Chat V3.1 | +4.9% |
| Claude Sonnet 4.5 | −42.0% to −30.8% |
| Grok 4 | −57.9% to −45.3% |
| Gemini 2.5 Pro | −56.7% to −45.5% |
| GPT-5 | −62.7% to −58.7% |
ForecastBench Live forecasting
| Model | Brier Index | Brier |
|---|---|---|
| Superforecaster median forecast | 67.5 | 0.106 |
| Public median forecast | 62.4 | 0.141 |
| o3-2025-04-16-scratchpad | 61.5 | 0.148 |
| kimi-k3-max-128k | 61.0 | 0.152 |
| minimax-m3-adaptive-thinking-12000 | 60.9 | 0.153 |
| claude-opus-4-1-20250805 | 60.6 | 0.156 |
| claude-3-7-sonnet-20250219-scratchpad | 60.6 | 0.155 |
| o4-mini-2025-04-16-scratchpad | 60.6 | 0.155 |
| claude-sonnet-4-6-adaptive-thinking-16000 | 60.6 | 0.155 |
| gpt-4.5-preview-2025-02-27 | 60.6 | 0.155 |
| o4-mini-2025-04-16 | 60.5 | 0.156 |
| grok-4.20-0309-reasoning | 60.5 | 0.156 |
Prophet Arena Live forecasting
| # | Agent | Skill | Brier | Events |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Agent GPT-6.1 Sol Pro (OpenCode) | +0.004 | 0.111 | 17 |
| 2 | Agent Muse Wonder (OpenCode) | +0.003 | 0.124 | 34 |
| 3 | Agent GPT-6 Astra (OpenCode) | +0.048 | 0.097 | 295 |
| 4 | Agent Gemini 4 Argon (OpenCode) | −0.002 | 0.129 | 34 |
| 5 | Agent Claude Opus 5.5 (OpenCode) | +0.042 | 0.103 | 296 |
| 6 | Claude Opus 5.5 | +0.035 | 0.110 | 444 |
| 7 | Agent Gemini 3.8 Flash (OpenCode) | +0.035 | 0.114 | 316 |
| 8 | Gemini 4 Argon | +0.030 | 0.121 | 64 |
| 9 | Gemini 3.8 Flash | +0.028 | 0.117 | 444 |
| 10 | Agent DeepSeek V4.1 Flash (OpenCode) | +0.027 | 0.119 | 344 |
Metaculus FutureEval (AI forecasting tournament) Live forecasting
- Professional forecasters still beat the best bot team, but the gap was not statistically significant (head-to-head −1.25, 95% CI −4.87 to 2.37).
- Among Metaculus's own reference bots, GPT-5.1 (high reasoning) with AskNews search scored best.
Trading robots with a broker-read record
| Signal | Growth | Max drawdown | Robot share | Subscribers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gold Spike | +271% | −8.1% | 100% | 23 |
| Gold Reaper New V2 2 MQL5 warns: Share of days for 80% of growth is too low MQL5 warns: Repeated no-trading-activity notices | +326% | −16.9% | 99% | 61 |
| GoldWave signal | +789% | −17.5% | 99% | 41 |
| Combo Profile 2026 | +774% | −19.3% | 100% | 31 |
| Precise Pair Trading Pro MQL5 warns: No trading activity in the last 10 days MQL5 warns: Max deposit load 98.93% | +605% | −23.8% | 98% | 18 |
| UpFuji MT4 | +315% | −27.1% | 99% | 10 |
| Kenni Trades Gold Breakout | +3,767% | −27.9% | 100% | 21 |
| Soma PureGold Indexes and Oil MQL5 warns: 80% of growth achieved within 14 days | +863% | −28.6% | 99% | 7 |
| MSC Gold Stable Pro | +1,536% | −33.7% | 97% | 31 |
| Onyx MT5 MQL5 warns: Trading style has changed; part of the history is not in the statistics | +809% | −36.6% | 100% | 2 |
| MSC SuperGold Pro MQL5 warns: Too much growth in the last month indicates a high risk | +16,916% | −53.0% | 96% | 16 |
Growth on small accounts compounds fast and big growth often comes from a few days; MQL5's own warnings are shown where it raises them. Copying a signal isn't the same as having its result.
Why 3Commas, Cryptohopper and Telegram bots aren't ranked
Their results live inside each user's own exchange account, so there's no public record to check. Marketplace returns are self-reported or backtested: CClaimed at best. See what AI trading products claim and what backs it up in our claim check. For those bots, check what we can verify: how much each one is used, what each bot can do with your money, the official links and known fakes, and the incidents. Bot makers who want verified results here can contact us about read-only verification.
How we verify
Account history from public chain and venue data: Hyperliquid's API and builder fills, and the on-chain Olas registry and prediction markets through Olas's public indexers. Nothing an operator sends us counts.
Returns net of deposits and withdrawals, max drawdown, Sortino, and BTC over the same dates. Before the leader's profit share.
Vaults: the venue must score 50%+ on our Safety score (Hyperliquid: 50%), and a fall of more than 30% from a peak means shown, not ranked. Agents: enough settled bets and recent activity.
Full method and limits
- Return: each step's profit over the capital at the start plus half the net deposits in that step (Modified Dietz), chained.
- Window: vaults, the last 12 months or since the account first held $10,000 if that's later; agents, the last 90 days.
- Agents: ROI = trading profit on settled markets over money settled; Brier = mean Brier score of settled bets; ranked by ROI, ties to more money settled. Read from Olas's public Predict indexers (Omen on Gnosis, Polymarket), which anyone can rebuild from the chain.
- AI apps: every fill Hyperliquid publishes for the app's builder code over 30 days: volume, distinct users, and closed PnL summed per user, before exchange fees. Sorted by volume, not ranked on skill.
- Robot signals (grade B): MQL5's own figures for real accounts with 90%+ robot trading, copied by hand with the date; shown, never ranked with grade A.
- AI models: other people's public benchmarks, linked and unchanged. Finished seasons are entered by hand; where sources disagree we show the range.
- Rank: Sortino ratio (return per unit of downside volatility), ties to the smaller drawdown.
- AI label: a name that says AI, or a leader description that claims AI runs the vault ("AI strategy", "automated AI", a model name). We quote it and don't verify how the vault trades.
- Security: a vault leader keeps at least 5% of the vault and takes a 10% profit share; depositors wait 1 day to withdraw. Hyperliquid's terms restrict US and Ontario (Canada) users and sanctioned countries.
- Limits: provisional data (older history comes in points several days apart, so older drawdowns may be understated); vaults that closed before we started recording aren't here; past results don't predict future results.