Verified usage · updated with the leaderboard · as of Nov 10, 2026
AI trading apps on Hyperliquid, by real usage
Which AI apps that trade Hyperliquid for you actually leave users in profit: users, volume and realized PnL, read from every public builder-code fill.
Senpi, Minara, DXAP, Wayfinder and other apps that trade for you with AI, compared on what actually happened: how many people used them, how much they traded and whether those users made money, read from every fill Hyperliquid published between Oct 11, 2026 and Nov 9, 2026.
All apps compared
Sorted by volume; this is not a ranking of skill. Users' realized PnL is the sum of closed PnL on the app's fills, before exchange fees; open positions aren't included.
| App | Users | Volume, 30 days | Users' realized PnL | Users in profit | Median user |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| tread.fi | 259 | $374.8M | $23k | 19% | −$6.05 |
| TrueNorth | 238 | $6.3M | −$209 | 54% | $0.07 |
| DXAP | 227 | $4.8M | $25k | 48% | −$0.21 |
| Senpi | 715 | $3.4M | −$1,094 | 47% | −$0.09 |
| Wayfinder | 18 | $1.9M | $1,508 | 56% | $0.16 |
| Katoshi | 15 | $578k | −$332 | 42% | −$6.88 |
| Midas | 20 | $30k | $464 | 60% | $0.02 |
| Minara AI | 8 | $6,705 | $63 | 75% | $5.90 |
| Starchild | 3 | $2,903 | $25 | 100% | $12.48 |
Each app's numbers
tread.fi
259 users traded $374.8M through tread.fi's builder code between Oct 11, 2026 and Nov 9, 2026. Their realized PnL on those fills was $23k; 19% of users with closed trades were in profit and the median user made −$6.05. The app earned $29k in builder fees on these fills.
How it trades, by its own description: AI agents (beta), market maker and delta-neutral bots, algo and manual orders. Source.
TrueNorth
238 users traded $6.3M through TrueNorth's builder code between Oct 11, 2026 and Nov 9, 2026. Their realized PnL on those fills was −$209; 54% of users with closed trades were in profit and the median user made $0.07. No builder fee was charged on these fills.
How it trades, by its own description: not clearly stated on its site. Source.
DXAP
227 users traded $4.8M through DXAP's builder code between Oct 11, 2026 and Nov 9, 2026. Their realized PnL on those fills was $25k; 48% of users with closed trades were in profit and the median user made −$0.21. The app earned $1,190 in builder fees on these fills.
How it trades, by its own description: autonomous agent, steered by chat. Source.
Senpi
715 users traded $3.4M through Senpi's builder code between Oct 11, 2026 and Nov 9, 2026. Their realized PnL on those fills was −$1,094; 47% of users with closed trades were in profit and the median user made −$0.09. The app earned $912 in builder fees on these fills.
How it trades, by its own description: autonomous strategies and manual or copy trades. Source.
Wayfinder
18 users traded $1.9M through Wayfinder's builder code between Oct 11, 2026 and Nov 9, 2026. Their realized PnL on those fills was $1,508; 56% of users with closed trades were in profit and the median user made $0.16. The app earned $887 in builder fees on these fills.
How it trades, by its own description: agent trades on request; automated strategies. Source.
Katoshi
15 users traded $578k through Katoshi's builder code between Oct 11, 2026 and Nov 9, 2026. Their realized PnL on those fills was −$332; 42% of users with closed trades were in profit and the median user made −$6.88. The app earned $115 in builder fees on these fills.
How it trades, by its own description: bots from alerts, webhooks or AI agents, plus a manual terminal. Source.
Midas
20 users traded $30k through Midas's builder code between Oct 11, 2026 and Nov 9, 2026. Their realized PnL on those fills was $464; 60% of users with closed trades were in profit and the median user made $0.02. The app earned $15 in builder fees on these fills.
How it trades, by its own description: copilot: AI suggests, the user taps to trade. Source.
Minara AI
8 users traded $6,705 through Minara AI's builder code between Oct 11, 2026 and Nov 9, 2026. Their realized PnL on those fills was $63; 75% of users with closed trades were in profit and the median user made $5.90. The app earned $1 in builder fees on these fills.
How it trades, by its own description: autopilot, AI copilot and manual orders. Source.
Starchild
3 users traded $2,903 through Starchild's builder code between Oct 11, 2026 and Nov 9, 2026. Their realized PnL on those fills was $25; 100% of users with closed trades were in profit and the median user made $12.48. The app earned $1 in builder fees on these fills.
How it trades, by its own description: copilot: orders from chat instructions. Source.
Each app's page
Read these numbers right
Trades sent another way, or on plans that don't add the builder code, are missed, so an app's real usage can be higher.
Apps mix autopilot, copilot and manual orders. These numbers show how users did with the app, not how the AI alone did.
Realized PnL comes from closing fills and is before Hyperliquid's trading fees and funding, so the real result is a little worse.
One month says little about skill. Watch the trend on the leaderboard, which updates with every data refresh.
FAQ
What is a Hyperliquid builder code?
A builder code is an address an app attaches to the orders it sends to Hyperliquid so it can charge a small fee. Hyperliquid publishes every fill that carried a builder code, which is how we can count each app's users, volume and results.
Do people make money with AI trading apps on Hyperliquid?
Over the last 30 days, users of 3 of the 9 apps we track lost money overall. Their combined realized PnL was $48k on $391.9M traded. In most apps fewer than half the users were in profit.
Does a profit or loss here mean the AI made that trade?
Not always. Several of these apps mix autopilot, copilot suggestions and manual orders, and the public fills don't say which was which. The numbers show how the app's users did, not how its AI did.
Why is an app I use missing?
Either we couldn't confirm its builder address from its own docs, code or DeFiLlama's open-source adapters, or its own site doesn't say it runs AI for users. Send it to us with the source.